{"id":13210,"date":"2026-07-03T15:04:39","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T14:04:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/?p=13210"},"modified":"2026-07-03T15:04:39","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T14:04:39","slug":"the-informal-economy-poses-a-challenge-to-the-social-protection-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/?p=13210&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"The Informal Economy Poses a Challenge to the Social Protection Program"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<h4 style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #666699;\">Despite the significant progress achieved in expanding social protection,a large segment of the population remains outside the scope of effective coverage because of the extensive informal economy. This structural contradiction highlights a fundamental disconnect between the legal framework and economic realities, raising important challenges for ensuring both equity and the financial sustainability of the social protection system.<\/span><\/h4>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This paper examines the challenge of integrating workers in the informal economy into Morocco\u2019s social protection system in light of the transition toward a social welfare state initiated by Framework Law No. 09.21 on social protection. Despite the progress achieved in implementing the social protection reform, particularly through the universalization of mandatory health insurance, this expansion raises fundamental questions about the institutional and financial capacity of the current system to integrate large segments of workers operating outside the formal economy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This paper argues that the limited incorporation of informal sector workers into Morocco\u2019s social protection system cannot be explained solely by gaps in legal coverage. Rather, it stems from deeper structural challenges related to the characteristics of the informal economy and the limited institutional and fiscal integration of informal workers. Through an analysis of the social protection framework and the obstacles to extending coverage, the paper seeks to assess the effectiveness of current policies and identify the reforms needed to achieve more inclusive social protection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The paper concludes that achieving effective and sustainable integration of workers in the informal economy requires a shift from the logic of expanding social coverage to a comprehensive reform approach that links social protection to broader economic restructuring policies, while simultaneously enhancing the financial sustainability of the system, allowing for a balance between the goals of social justice and the requirements of economic efficiency.<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The expansion of social protection in Morocco represents a pivotal moment in the country&#8217;s path toward building a social state, not only because it broadens access to social rights, but also because it redefines the relationship between the state, work, and social security within an economic context where formal and informal forms of organization coexist. After decades of a model primarily centered on protecting formally employed workers, Morocco has shifted toward a universal approach aimed at integrating all citizens into a unified system of protection against social risks, as established under Framework Law No. 09.21.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, this ambitious shift intersects with a complex structural reality: the significant weight of the informal economy within the national labor market. A considerable portion of the economically active population works outside the framework of official registration and without a regular institutional link to tax collection or social security agencies. This means that the universalization effort faces not only a technical challenge in expanding coverage but also a structural question regarding the feasibility of integrating a broad category of workers whose activities are characterized by instability, volatility, and weak administrative ties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Given this structural reality, it is clear that the social protection expansion initiative cannot be evaluated only in terms of coverage rates or the expansion of beneficiary numbers; rather, it must be analyzed in light of the nature of the economy intended to be integrated into the system. The significant weight of the informal economy within the labor market raises a fundamental question regarding the adequacy of the existing legal and institutional framework to accommodate unstable forms of work, irregular incomes, and production relationships with weak ties to registration and tax collection. Therefore, deconstructing the legal and institutional architecture of mainstreaming initiatives is a first step toward understanding the limits of integration before moving on to assess the challenges of reform and sustainability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Accordingly, this paper is organized around three interconnected themes. The first theme addresses the legal and institutional framework for social protection by analyzing the normative aspirations of Framework Law No. 09.21 and the limitations of the integration tools it employs with regard to workers in the informal sector. The second theme examines the position of the informal economy in the process of implementing social protection programs, through an analysis of the data and indicators related to its structure and weight within the national economy. The third theme is devoted to analyzing the obstacles and avenues for integrating workers in the informal economy into the social protection system.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>Social Protection for Workers in the Informal Sector<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The universalization of social protection represents one of the most significant shifts in Morocco\u2019s social policy in recent years, not only because of its financial and institutional scale, but also because of the challenges it raises, which extend beyond expanding coverage to redefining the state&#8217;s role in the provision and governance of social protection.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The Context of the Adoption of Framework Law 09.21: From a Fragile Protection System to the Choice of Universalization<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The adoption of Framework Law No. 09.21 on social protection in 2021 was not merely an isolated sectoral reform; rather, it occurred within the context of profound economic and social transformations that the COVID-19 pandemic exposed in a sharp and unprecedented manner. The crisis highlighted the limitations of Morocco\u2019s previous social protection model, which for decades had been characterized by a proliferation of programs, a fragmentation of stakeholders, and weak policy coordination; while its effectiveness in ensuring comprehensive protection for the most vulnerable groups particularly those working outside thee formal sector remained limited<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted that vulnerability in Morocco extends beyond traditionally poor households to include a broad segment of informal workers whose livelihoods depend on daily or seasonal economic activity. Lacking formal employment contracts, health insurance, and income protection mechanisms, these workers were particularly exposed to the effects of the economic shutdown. More broadly, the crisis revealed the structural fragility of Morocco\u2019s labor market, characterized by the persistence of informality and the exclusion of a significant share of workers from formal registration systems and social security schemes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this context, social protection reform is no longer presented as merely a social choice but has become a political and institutional necessity<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a>. The pandemic accelerated a policy shift toward the construction of a universal and shock-responsive social protection system, highlighting the limitations of fragmented and predominantly targeted social assistance programs. This transformation emerged alongside broader reflections on Morocco\u2019s development model and was accompanied by an official recognition that previous development approaches had not succeeded in ensuring the effective inclusion of large segments of the population in the benefits of economic growth and social development.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That said, the Framework Law No. 09.21 emerged at the intersection of three major dynamics: the social and economic disruptions revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the growing awareness of the shortcomings of fragmented social policies, and the consolidation of constitutional and international norms that recognize social protection as a universal right. However, the adoption of the law does not in itself resolve the structural challenge of inclusion. The key question remains whether the reform marks a substantive shift toward an integrated social protection system or whether it primarily represents an ambitious policy commitment whose instruments remain insufficiently adapted to the realities of Morocco\u2019s predominantly informal labor market. This paper addresses that question by examining the extent to which the law design and implementation mechanisms can extend effective coverage to informal workers.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Limitations of the Legal Framework for Integrating Workers in the Informal Sector<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Despite the importance of Framework Law 09.21 as a fundamental step toward building a more inclusive welfare state, a critical reading of this text reveals structural limitations that may obstruct the integration of workers in the informal sector into the social protection system.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first limitation relates to the gap between the comprehensive vision of social protection embodied in international standards and its more restricted operationalization at the national level. International instruments, notably ILO Convention No. 102 and Recommendation No. 202, conceive social protection as an integrated system designed to guarantee protection against a wide range of social and economic risks throughout the life cycle. In contrast, the Moroccan reform has largely concentrated on expanding coverage within existing schemes, without fully embracing the broader institutional and social dimensions of social protection. Although Morocco&#8217;s legal framework embraces the principles of inclusivity, its implementation mechanisms are still largely based on the assumption that individuals have a regular, formally declared income. This assumption, however, excludes a substantial proportion of workers in the informal sector, whose incomes are often irregular and not officially declared<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A second limitation relates to the gap between formal coverage and effective inclusion. While the reform formally extends social protection to a broader segment of the population, it remains insufficiently adapted to the realities of many informal workers, including street vendors, casual laborers, seasonal workers, and individuals engaged in micro-scale economic activities. The irregular nature of their incomes, weak administrative integration, and limited interaction with formal institutions create significant barriers to enrollment and continued participation. Consequently, the expansion of legal entitlements should not be equated with the effective expansion of social protection, as sustainable inclusion requires institutional mechanisms capable of accommodating the specific conditions of informal employment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The third challenge concerns the tension between social aspirations and the requirements of fiscal balance. The total cost of universal social protection has been estimated, in official documents, at approximately 51 billion dirhams annually, divided between contribution-based funding and solidarity-based funding that covers groups unable to contribute.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a>Accordingly, the sustainability of the system requires the expansion of its funding base in parallel with the extension of beneficiary coverage. However, a central challenge stems from the structural characteristics of the informal economy, where economic actors frequently operate beyond established mechanisms of registration and contribution collection. Consequently, the extension of social protection raises not only questions of coverage and inclusion but also broader concerns regarding institutional capacity and the financing mechanisms required to sustain the system over the long term.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The importance of international comparison emerges once again. International reports confirm that economies that expanded social coverage without parallel reforms to governance and financing systems faced real difficulties in terms of sustainability and rising deficits. Therefore, discussions of inclusion in the Moroccan context cannot be separated from the question of fiscal sustainability, equitable burden-sharing, and tax justice. Indeed, some critical analyses<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> have argued that the danger lies not only in weak financing; however, the expansion of social protection alone is unlikely to produce a significant transformative impact unless it is accompanied by structural reforms addressing the informal economy and longstanding distortions within the tax system. Otherwise, it risks serving primarily as a mechanism for reallocating public expenditure rather than tackling the underlying drivers of vulnerability and exclusion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The fourth challenge concerns the gap between the legal text and its actual implementation. National reports are noting that the previous system was characterized by a proliferation of programs, poor coordination, complex procedures, limited involvement of local communities, and targeting discrepancies. While the framework law was intended to address these shortcomings, its success remains<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The gap between the legal framework and the effective delivery of social protection is therefore not simply an implementation challenge. It is rooted in the structural realities of Morocco\u2019s labor market, where widespread informality limits the reach of conventional social security and fiscal arrangements. As a result, the success of social protection reform will depend not only on legislative expansion but also on the state&#8217;s ability to adapt its institutions to the realities of informal employment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Therefore, the efforts to universalize social protection remains contingent on the extent to which public policies can develop gradual and flexible integration mechanisms that allow workers in the informal sector to be linked to the social protection system without undermining its financial balance and without stripping the principle of universality of its rights-based substance.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>2 . <\/strong><strong>Social Protection and the Informal Economy: The Current Reality<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>The challenges associated with implementing social protection in Morocco cannot be fully understood without considering the central role of the informal economy in both the labor market and the broader economic structure. Despite the ambitious vision set out in Framework Law No. 09.21, the effective inclusion of informal workers remains constrained by the structural characteristics of informal employment and the difficulties involved in designing appropriate targeting, registration, and financing mechanisms. As a result, the success of social protection reform depends not only on expanding legal coverage but also on developing institutional arrangements capable of addressing the realities of a highly informal labor market.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The Structural Weight of the Informal Economy <\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The informal economy constitutes a structural component of the Moroccan labor market, comprising a large number ofsmall production units operating outside the regulatory and tax framework. According to the results of the national survey on unorganized production units conducted by the High Commission for Planning, the number of these units exceeded 2 million, employing more than 5 million people<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a>. This figure reflects the significant role this sector plays in absorbing unemployment and creating job opportunities; however, it also poses major challenges for public policies aimed at expanding the social safety net.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Estimates indicate that the informal economy contributes approximately 30 to 35 percent of GDP, making it a key component of the national economy <a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn7\" name=\"_ftnref7\">[7]<\/a>. However, this economic importance is not necessarily reflected in its integration into social and tax systems, as a large portion of workers in this sector remain outside social security, health insurance, and pension systems.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Analysis of the sector&#8217;s structure reveals that it consists primarily of very small production units based on individual or family labor, characterized by weak capital, low productivity, and a lack of legal regulation. These units are most prevalent in the small trade, services, traditional crafts, construction, and transportation sectors, activities that often rely on unstable or seasonal incomes, thus limiting the ability of their workers to participate in social protection systems based on regular contributions.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn8\" name=\"_ftnref8\">[8]<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400; text-align: center;\"><strong>Figure 1: The Structure of the Informal Economy<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"312\"><strong>Indicator<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"312\"><strong>Estimated Value<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"312\"><strong>Number of Informal Production Units<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"312\">2.03 million units<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"312\"><strong>Number of Workers in the Sector<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"312\">Approximately 5.5 million people<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"312\"><strong>Percentage of Informal Employment in the Non-Agricultural Workforce<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"312\">Approximately 47%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"312\"><strong>The sector\u2019s contribution to gross domestic product<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"312\">Between 30% and 35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"312\"><strong>Percentage of individual or family-run units<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"312\">More than 85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Source: Compiled by the researcher based on the High Commission for Planning\u2019s 2023\u20132024 National Survey on Informal Production Units. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These data reveal that the informal economy is not a marginal or temporary phenomenon but rather constitutes a parallel structure within the national economy. Furthermore, the predominance of very small, individual or family-run production units reflects the limited institutional organization of this sector, which poses significant challenges to its integration into social protection systems based primarily on formal employment relationships and regular administrative registration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From this perspective, integrating workers in the informal economy into the social protection system cannot be limited to technical procedures related to registration or enrollment; rather, it requires a broader approach that takes into account the nature of this sector and its economic and social structure.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Gaps in Social Risk Coverage for Workers in the Sector<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While the structural weight of the informal economy helps explain the challenges associated with extending social protection coverage, an analysis of coverage indicators reveals significant gaps between legislative ambitions and actual enrollment, particularly with regard to protection against key social risks such as illness, loss of income, and family-related vulnerabilities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this context, the universalization of compulsory health insurance constitutes one of the most significant pillars of this initiative. It has contributed to a substantial expansion of health coverage, with a \u00a0rate increasing from approximately 42% in 2020 to nearly 88% in 2024. This progress reflects a relative success in integrating new categories of beneficiaries, particularly non-salaried workers and individuals operating within the informal economy, either through the compulsory health insurance scheme for non-salaried workers (AMO) or through the AMO Tadamon scheme, under which the state assumes the payment of contributions for low-income households.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, these figures should be interpreted with caution. An increase in formal coverage rates does not necessarily translate into effective access to healthcare services, nor does it guarantee the sustainability of beneficiaries\u2019 enrollment in the system. As a result, the distinction between nominal coverage and actual access remains a central challenge in assessing the effectiveness of social protection reforms.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400; text-align: center;\"><strong>Figure 2: Trend in the Number of People Covered by Health Insurance<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-13211 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Picture1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"974\" height=\"583\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Picture1.png 974w, https:\/\/mipa.institute\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Picture1-640x383.png 640w, https:\/\/mipa.institute\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Picture1-768x460.png 768w, https:\/\/mipa.institute\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Picture1-320x192.png 320w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 974px) 100vw, 974px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Source: Compiled by the researcher based on data from the National Social Security Fund and the Ministry of Economy and Finance.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An analysis of this figure reveals that the rapid increase in the number of beneficiaries reflects a strong momentum in expanding coverage; however, it also raises questions about the quality of this inclusion. A significant portion of this expansion is linked to the inclusion of certain groups within a solidarity-based system, rather than resulting from actual participation based on regular contributions. Furthermore, some registered groups may face difficulties in accessing benefits due to the complexity of procedures or limited access to health services, particularly in rural areas.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From this perspective, the shift from a focus on \u201cexpanding coverage\u201d to ensuring \u201ceffectiveness\u201d remains a key challenge for social protection initiatives, particularly for workers in the informal sector who face multiple constraints related to access and sustainability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Building on this analysis, the issue of fiscal balance emerges as one of the central challenges associated with expanding social protection. Reports on the implementation of social protection programs indicate that the expansion of the beneficiary base has not been accompanied by growth in the number of actual contributors at the same pace. Workers in the informal sector often face difficulties in making contributions due to irregular incomes or poor integration into the tax system. This situation leads to a structural gap between the beneficiary base and the contributor base, as a significant portion of the funding associated with the universalization of social protection relies on public resources. Estimates by Morocco&#8217;s Ministry of Economy and Finance<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn9\" name=\"_ftnref9\">[9]<\/a> indicate that the cost of this reform could exceed MAD 50 billion annually once its implementation is fully completed. Over the medium term, the persistence of this imbalance may place increasing pressure on the financial sustainability of the system, particularly if public policies fail to integrate a larger share of informal sector workers into the social protection and tax systems.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this context, the integration of workers in the informal economy extends beyond a social objective; it becomes a fiscal and institutional imperative, closely linked to maintaining the long-term financial sustainability and balance of the social protection system. Regarding the universalization of family allowances, the Unified Social Register represents one of the most important institutional mechanisms adopted by Morocco to improve the targeting of social protection programs and direct support toward the most vulnerable groups<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn10\" name=\"_ftnref10\">[10]<\/a>. This system is based on collecting social and economic data on households and determining their eligibility to benefit from various support programs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, implementing this mechanism poses several challenges related to the nature of the informal economy. Many workers in this sector do not have a fixed or declarable income, and some possess modest assets or property that may affect the assessment of their social status within the targeting index, even though their actual income may remain limited. This could result in the exclusion of certain vulnerable groups from social support programs or free health coverage.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn11\" name=\"_ftnref11\">[11]<\/a>Furthermore, the success of the Unified Social Registry remains tied to the level of trust it enjoys among citizens, as well as the administration\u2019s ability to regularly update data and ensure transparency in the targeting process.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Barriers to and Pathways for the Integration of Informal Economy Workers into the Social Protection System<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While the initiative to extend social protection represents one of the most significant social reforms in recent decades, its success remains tied to its ability to integrate broad segments of workers operating outside the formal economy. However, this integration not only faces numerous challenges that require the adoption of appropriate approaches to prevent these workers from remaining outside the formal social protection networks, but also encounters a series of intertwined structural barriers that reflect the nature of the informal economy itself and reveal the limitations of the legal and institutional tools used to address it.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Factors Excluding Workers in the Informal Sector from the Social Protection System<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the most significant obstacles to integrating workers in the informal economy into the social protection system is the lack of a precise legal definition of this sector within the national legislative framework. Economic and social legislation in Morocco often distinguishes between wage labor and self-employment, without providing a clear legal framework for groups engaged in unregulated or unauthorized economic activities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This legal ambiguity makes it difficult to identify the target groups of social inclusion policies and complicates the process of designing appropriate mechanisms to integrate this group into social protection systems. Reports by the International Labour Organization have noted that the absence of a clear institutional definition of the informal economy represents one of the most significant obstacles facing policies to extend social protection in many developing countries. Furthermore, the complexity of administrative procedures related to registration and professional licensing remains a factor limiting the participation of workers in the informal economy within formal systems. For many small business owners or artisans, the procedures for registering with tax or social security systems may seem complex or costly relative to the limited nature of their economic activity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The limited integration of workers in the informal economy into the social protection system is closely linked to a range of economic and fiscal factors inherent to the nature of the sector. Income generated through informal economic activities is often irregular and unpredictable, while many workers depend on daily or seasonal earnings that do not easily fit within conventional contribution-based social protection schemes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this context, international studies indicate that workers in the informal economy often prioritize meeting their immediate economic needs over contributing to social protection schemes whose benefits may not be immediately visible or tangible. This tendency constitutes a significant obstacle to their integration into social protection systems.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn12\" name=\"_ftnref12\">[12]<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moreover, the limited integration of the informal economy into the tax system presents an additional challenge. Many informal production units operate outside any clearly defined tax framework, reducing the state&#8217;s ability to monitor their economic activities and accurately assess their capacity to contribute to the financing of social protection programs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This situation creates a twofold problem: on the one hand, it is difficult to determine the actual financial capacity of this group; on the other hand, it raises challenges related to the principle of tax justice, as workers in the formal sector may perceive a disparity in tax and social obligations between themselves and actors in the informal economy. In addition to legal and economic factors, social and sociological factors play an important role in explaining the persistence of the informal economy and the difficulty of integrating it into formal systems. In many cases, informal work is linked to a deeply rooted economic and social culture based on flexibility and reliance on social relationships and local networks rather than on formal institutions. Furthermore, some economic actors may prefer to continue operating outside regulatory frameworks to avoid the administrative constraints or financial obligations associated with the formal economy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Furthermore, low trust in public institutions is a significant factor in this context. Studies on trust in public administration have shown that some citizens remain reluctant to engage with formal systems due to their perception of institutional inefficiency or the complexity of administrative procedures<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn13\" name=\"_ftnref13\">[13]<\/a>. At the same time, political considerations play a significant role in addressing the issue of integrating the informal economy. Given the large size of this sector within the labor market, its workers constitute a broad social group, and any reform affecting their activities could have direct implications for social stability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this context, governments may sometimes hesitate to impose strict measures to formalize this sector or require it to pay taxes and social contributions similar to those imposed on the formal sector, for fear of social tensions or of affecting the livelihoods of broad segments of the population that also constitute an important electoral base for political actors. Furthermore, the lack of accurate data on the actual economic situation of a large number of workers in this sector makes it difficult to design effective integration policies without risking the exclusion of certain vulnerable groups or imposing financial burdens disproportionate to their economic capacity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>3 . <\/strong><strong>Toward a More Inclusive and Sustainable Model of Social Protection<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Strengthening the effectiveness of this reform agenda requires a set of integrated measures that address the legislative, institutional, and financial dimensions of social protection, while also linking social protection policies to broader strategies for economic reform and social development. Key priorities include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Developing a more inclusive legal framework for social protection<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Integrating workers in the informal economy requires a legal framework that reflects the diversity of employment arrangements charachterizing this sector. Although Framework Law No. 09.21 laid the foundation for the universalization of social protection, its broad orientation needs to be complemented by more detailed legislative and regulatory measures that consider the specific circumstances of self-employed workers and small-scale economic activities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this regard, policymakers could consider introducing more flexible legal arrangements that facilitate the inclusion of informal workers in social protection schemes without imposing requirements that may be difficult for them to meet. The legal framework governing self-employment, digital platform work, and other emerging forms of employment should also be strengthened. Such reforms would help bridge the gap between the formal social protection framework and the realities of a labor market, increasingly characterized by diverse and non-standard forms of work.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Strengthening institutional governance and improving the integration of social data systems<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>International experience demonstrates that the success of social protection policies depends largely on effective institutional governance and the ability of public institutions to coordinate their actions. In Morocco, closer coordination among key actors involved in social protection including the National Social Security Fund (CNSS), the Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Ministry of Economic Inclusion is essential to improving the effectiveness of social policies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Unified Social Registry represents an important tool for improving the targeting of beneficiaries. However, its effectiveness depends on the regular updating of social data and stronger interoperability between public databases. Developing an integrated information system that links tax, social, and employment data would enhance the state&#8217;s ability to monitor the situation of informal workers and assess their eligibility for social protection programs more accurately.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Building a more sustainable financing model for social protection<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Financing remains one of the most significant challenges associated with expanding social protection coverage. As the number of beneficiaries of social assistance and health insurance programs continues to grow, pressure on public finances increases, particularly when the growth in the contributor base does not keep pace with the expansion of beneficiaries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ensuring the long-term financial sustainability of the system therefore requires a more diversified financing model based on broadening the contribution base and strengthening national solidarity mechanisms that support vulnerable groups. Consideration could also be given to introducing flexible contribution schemes adapted to the irregular income patterns common among informal workers, such as progressive or seasonal contributions. Over time, such measures could facilitate the gradual transition of informal workers from beneficiaries of social support to active contributors to the financing of the social protection system.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Linking social protection to broader economic restructuring policies<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>The sustainable integration of informal workers into social protection systems cannot be achieved in isolation from broader economic policies aimed at promoting formalization and creating decent formal employment opportunities. Social protection should not be viewed solely as a mechanism for providing social assistance, it should also serve as a tool for fostering economic inclusion, improving working conditions, and supporting a more inclusive model of development.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this context, incentive policies can be developed to encourage workers in the informal sector to gradually transition toward the formal economy, by simplifying administrative procedures and reducing the tax burden on small businesses during the initial stages of restructuring. Vocational training programs can also be strengthened, self-initiative supported, and small and medium-sized enterprises encouraged, thereby contributing to broadening the base of the formal economy and raising the level of economic productivity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An examination of the reality of social protection in Morocco, in relation to the informal economy, reveals a fundamental structural paradox: while the universalization of social protection is one of the most prominent reform projects launched by the state over the past decade, a significant portion of the national workforce continues to work outside the institutional frameworks that allow for effective access to this protection. This paradox is exacerbated by the significant economic and social weight of the informal sector, which has become a primary space for absorbing large segments of the workforce, particularly given the limited opportunities in the formal sector.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Analysis has shown that the challenge of integrating workers in the informal sector into the social protection system cannot be reduced to a mere technical issue related to registration or financing mechanisms; rather, it is deeply linked to multidimensional structural constraints. This necessitates a shift from a narrow sectoral approach toward a more comprehensive vision that takes into account the interdependence between labor market regulation, improving economic productivity, and promoting social justice. In light of this, we propose the following:<\/p>\n<h5><\/h5>\n<ol>\n<li>Establishing a \u201cproportional contribution\u201d system that links deductions to professionals\u2019 actual cash flows, while implementing an \u201cautomatic funding\u201d mechanism by deducting micro-contributions from bills for essential services.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftn14\" name=\"_ftnref14\">[14]<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Developing algorithms for the \u201cUnified Social Registry\u201d by linking its database to an artificial intelligence system that analyzes electricity bills or phone balance transactions to distinguish between structural vulnerability and professional activities, and to transition from static to dynamic targeting, ensuring that groups in the \u201cgray zone\u201d are not excluded.<\/li>\n<li>Amend the Labour Code to include a legal status for platform-dependent self-employed workers, thereby regulating hybrid forms of employment and extending social protection to workers in the digital and service sectors.<\/li>\n<li>Create economic incentives by linking regular social security contributions to tangible benefits, such as priority access to small public procurement contracts and preferential access to bank financing schemes (e.g., the Intilaka program and similar initiatives).<\/li>\n<li>Ensuring financial sustainability by enacting a \u201csocial solidarity tax\u201d on high-value-added sectors to offset the deficit resulting from the integration of unregulated sectors with limited income.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ultimately, a comprehensive package of measures is required\u2014one that goes beyond merely expanding social protection coverage as a quantitative objective. Instead, it should seek to design a flexible social protection system capable of absorbing the income volatility that characterizes the informal sector. Such an approach would shift this reform agenda from being viewed primarily as a budgetary burden to being understood as an inclusive development strategy that reconciles the imperatives of financial sustainability, social cohesion, and effective universal access to social protection.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808080;\">Footnotes<\/span><\/h5>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> Othman Makhoun, Social Protection Workshops: Can Morocco Overcome the Challenges It Faces?, An Analytical Study on the Reform of Morocco\u2019s Social Protection System. \u2013 Ministry of Economy and Finance, Integrated Public Policy for Social Protection 2020\u20132030, Rabat \u2013 Economic, Social, and Environmental Council, Reports and Opinions on the Reform of the Social Protection System in Morocco, Rabat, 2021.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Ouis El Ghazawi, Challenges in Implementing Social Protection Programs in Morocco, Academic Study, Research Student with a Master\u2019s Degree in Public Law, Morocco.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> Presentation by the Minister of Economy and Finance on Universal Social Protection, 2021 \u2013 Report of the House of Representatives\u2019 Social Sectors Committee on Reforming the Social Protection System.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Abdul-Rafee\u2019 Za\u2019noun, \u201cConditional Cash Transfers in the Arab Region and the Dilemma of Social Justice,\u201d Rawaq Arabi Journal, Issue 29, 2014, p. 108. Available at: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.53833\/EJKQ2599\u062a\u0645 Accessed on: 01\/13\/2026.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> Remarks by the President of the House of Councillors at the International Parliamentary Forum on Social Justice \u2013 Ministry of Solidarity and Social Development, Integrated Public Policy for Social Protection 2020\u20132030.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\">[6]<\/a> (High Commission for Planning, National Survey on Informal Production Units 2023\u20132024, Rabat, May 28, 2024) The report indicated that the informal sector comprised approximately 2.03 million unorganized production units in 2023, an increase of more than 353,000 units compared to 2014. Field data was also collected over a full year to account for seasonal variations.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref7\" name=\"_ftn7\">[7]<\/a> Previous reference: High Commission for Planning, High Commission for Planning Briefs, No. 16, March 2, titled: The Informal Sector: Main Characteristics and Pace of Development.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref8\" name=\"_ftn8\">[8]<\/a> Higher Commission for Planning, National Survey on the Informal Sector 2023\u20132024, Rabat<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref9\" name=\"_ftn9\">[9]<\/a> Ministry of Economy and Finance, Explanatory Memorandum for the 2026 Finance Bill, attached reports on social protection.<\/small><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref10\" name=\"_ftn10\">[10]<\/a> Economic, Social, and Environmental Council, Opinion on Bill No. 72.18 Concerning the System for Identifying Beneficiaries of Social Support Programs and the Establishment of the National Registry Agency, Self-Referral No. 44\/2020, p. 15.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref11\" name=\"_ftn11\">[11]<\/a> Said Al-Sharqawi, \u201cThe Unified Social Registry: From a Tool for Ensuring the Effectiveness of Social Programs to a Smooth Mechanism for Establishing a Model of the Welfare State,\u201d an article published on the website of the Moroccan Institute for Policy Analysis, March 12, 2025.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref12\" name=\"_ftn12\">[12]<\/a> The World Bank, Reports on the Informal Economy and Social Protection Reforms in Morocco<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref13\" name=\"_ftn13\">[13]<\/a> Dr. Mohammed Masbah, Dr. Rachid Aourraz, Dr. Hajar Idrissi, Anne-Louise Bauman, and Tarik Lahrach, <em>Confidence Index 2022: Trust in Public Administration During the Pandemic<\/em>, Moroccan Institute for Policy Analysis, Rabat.<\/small><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><small><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/980C11BC-7835-414E-9B76-66A7E5DB4617#_ftnref14\" name=\"_ftn14\">[14]<\/a> Replace fixed subscription fees with a flexible percentage linked to the number of authorized transactions or through withholding at source.<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Despite the significant progress achieved in expanding social protection,a large segment of the population remains outside the scope of effective coverage because of the extensive informal economy. This structural contradiction highlights a fundamental disconnect between the legal framework and economic realities, raising important challenges for ensuring both equity and the financial sustainability of the social protection system.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":124,"featured_media":8851,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[92,2153,123],"tags":[],"coauthors":[2298],"class_list":["post-13210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economic-development-en","category-highlight","category-research"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/124"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13210"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13210\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13213,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13210\/revisions\/13213"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8851"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13210"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mipa.institute\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=13210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}